Corporate Psychopathy
Also known as: Executive Psychopathy, Organizational Dark Triad, Snakes in Suits
Key researchers: Boddy, Babiak, Hare
Definition
A leadership pathology characterized by the presence of individuals with psychopathic traits (lack of empathy, manipulativeness, superficial charm, grandiosity) in executive positions. These individuals manipulate organizational systems for personal gain, often causing significant harm to employees, stakeholders, and long-term organizational health.
Diagnostic Criteria
- Pattern of executive decisions prioritizing personal gain over organizational welfare
- Documented instances of manipulation, deception, or exploitation
- High turnover in executive's direct reports ('churn and burn')
- Significant gap between public persona and internal behavior patterns
- History of organizational conflicts following the executive across roles
Symptoms
- Employee psychological distress and fear
- Unexplained resource misallocation
- Ethical boundary violations normalized
- Information hoarding and manipulation
- Scapegoating and blame-shifting patterns
- Retaliation against whistleblowers
Disease Stages
Stage 1: Infiltration (charm offensive, rapid advancement)
Stage 2: Consolidation (building loyalist network, removing threats)
Stage 3: Exploitation (resource extraction, empire building)
Stage 4: Departure or discovery (scandal, investigation, or move to next target)
Typical Course
Can persist for years if protected by results or powerful allies. Often ends abruptly with scandal or organizational crisis. Damage may take years to fully manifest and longer to remediate.
Etiology
Psychopathic individuals are drawn to positions of power. Modern corporate structures with weak governance, emphasis on short-term results, and tolerance for 'difficult' high performers create favorable conditions for their advancement.
Risk Factors
- Weak board oversight and governance
- Performance-at-all-costs culture
- Rapid growth environments with loose controls
- Industries with high executive autonomy
- Organizations recovering from crisis (seeking 'strong' leadership)
Differential Diagnosis
Conditions that may present similarly or co-occur:
Prognosis
Poor for organization while individual remains in power. Recovery possible after departure but requires deliberate cultural remediation. Psychopathic individuals rarely change; they simply move to new organizations.
References
Defining Source
Boddy, C.R. (2021). Corporate Psychopaths and Destructive Leadership in Organisations. Destructive Leadership and Management Hypocrisy, Emerald Publishing. DOI: 10.1108/978-1-80043-180-520211005
Abstract
The study of corporate psychopaths has gone from something which some academic peers found somewhat incredible, and even laughable, in 2005, to an area where an increasing amount of research is taking place across many disciplines. Destructive, unethical and psychopathic leadership is, by and large, still unexpected in the workplace, and this magnifies its impact as employees struggle to know how to deal with it. Such destructive leadership is also jarring and quite often traumatic for the employees concerned as well as being damaging to the organisations involved.
Additional Sources
- Boddy, Clive R. (2021) - Corporate Psychopaths and Destructive Leadership in Organisations
Known Cases
- Enron
- Theranos
- Various financial institutions (2008 crisis)
Classification
- Code
- LP-002
- Localization
- Leadership Pathology
- Primary Etiology
- Founder-induced
- Typical Course
- Chronic
- Functional Impairment
- Affect
Contribute
See an error or have additional information? Help improve this entry.